Skip to Main Content

Senior Project: Source Validation

Step 4: Source Validation Form and Conference

Students will narrow the sources they will use in their paper from 6 sources to 5 (one of which must be the personal interview).

Once your teacher has checked your Deep Research, you will determine the validity and relevance of the sources you have chosen to use in the paper. In a short 4-5 minute conference with your teacher, you will be asked to defend these 5 sources and how you plan to use them in the paper.

NOTE: Students will NOT be able to start outlining and/or writing the paper until they have successfully defended these 5 sources.

Printer-friendly versions:

Click on your class to access the in-class activity.

  • MacIntosh - A
  • MacIntosh - B
  • Peecher (Pickford) - B
  • Peecher (Pickford) - C
  • Caswell - E
  • MacIntosh - G

Fact Checking & Source Evaluation Resources

Online Fact-Checking Sites

Source Evaluation Guides & Tutorials

Free Interactive Ebooks & Online Courses

Strategies for Evaluating Sources: SIFT & PICK

SIFT & PICK

What Makes an Information Source "Good?"

“Good” sources include those that provide complete, current, factual information, and/or credible arguments based on the information creator’s original research, expertise, and/or use of other reliable sources.

Whether a source is a good choice for you depends on your information needs and how you plan to use the source.

Evaluating Sources Using Lateral & Vertical Reading

The SIFT* & PICK approach to evaluating sources helps you select quality sources by practicing:

yellow arrow pointing to the right  Lateral Reading (SIFT): fact-checking by examining other sources and internet fact-checking tools; and

green arrow pointing downVertical Reading (PICK): examining the source itself to decide whether it is the best choice for your needs.

*The SIFT method was created by Mike Caulfield under a CC BY 4.0 International License.

SIFT

SIFT

Stop

  • Check your emotions before engaging
  • Do you know and trust the author, publisher, publication, or website?
    • If not, use the following fact-checking strategies before reading, sharing, or using the source in your research

Investigate the source

  • Don’t focus on the source itself for now
  • Instead, read laterally
    • Learn about the source’s author, publisher, publication, website, etc. from other sources, such as Wikipedia

Find better coverage

  • Focus on the information rather than getting attached to a particular source
  • If you can’t determine whether a source is reliable, trade up for a higher quality source
  • Professional fact checkers build a list of sources they know they can trust

Trace claims to the original context

  • Identify whether the source is original or re-reporting
  • Consider what context might be missing in re-reporting
  • Go “upstream” to the original source
    • Was the version you saw accurate and complete

REFLECT

Did you need to investigate the source? If so, what did you learn? Are the claims original or re-reported? What is the impact on the information?

PICK

PICK

Purpose / Genre / Type

  • Determine the type of source (book, article, website, social media post, etc.)
    • Why and how it was created? How it was reviewed before publication?
  • Determine the genre of the source (factual reporting, opinion, ad, satire, etc.)
  • Consider whether the type and genre are appropriate for your information needs

Information Relevance / Usefulness

  • Consider how well the content of the source addresses your specific information needs
    • Is it directly related to your topic?
    • How does it help you explore a research interest or develop an argument?

Creation Date

  • Determine when the source was first published or posted
    • Is the information in the source (including cited references) up-to-date?
  • Consider whether newer sources are available that would add important information

Knowledge-Building

  • Consider how this source relates to the body of knowledge on the topic
    • Does it echo other experts’ contributions? Does it challenge them in important ways?
    • Does this source contribute something new to the conversation?
  • Consider what voices or perspectives are missing or excluded from the conversation
    • Does this source represent an important missing voice or perspective on the topic?
    • Are other sources available that better include those voices or perspectives?
  • How does this source help you to build and share your own knowledge?

REFLECT

What is the impact of the purpose, relevance, and usefulness of the source on your project/paper? Most importantly, how does this source help you to build and share your own knowledge?

Creative Commons License SIFT & PICK by Ellen Carey is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Last updated 4/11/23.